Tuning Strategies¶
-
2.1. Tuning Space
2.2. Exit Policy
2.3. Accuracy Criteria
2.4. Traverse
-
3.1. O0
3.2. Basic
3.3. MSE
3.4. MSE_V2
3.5. HAWQ_V2
3.6. Bayesian
3.7. Exhaustive
3.8. Random
3.9. SigOpt
3.10. TPE
Introduction¶
Intel® Neural Compressor aims to help users quickly deploy
the low-precision inference solution on popular Deep Learning frameworks such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, ONNX, and MXNet. With built-in strategies, it automatically optimizes low-precision recipes for deep learning models to achieve optimal product objectives, such as inference performance and memory usage, with expected accuracy criteria. Currently, several strategies, including O0
, Basic
, MSE
, MSE_V2
, HAWQ_V2
, Bayesian
, Exhaustive
, Random
, SigOpt
, TPE
, etc are supported. By default, the Basic
strategy is used for tuning.
Strategy Design¶
Before tuning, the tuning space
was constructed according to the framework capability and user configuration. Then the selected strategy generates the next quantization configuration according to its traverse logic and the previous tuning record. The tuning process stops when meeting the exit policy. The function of strategies is shown
below:
Tuning Space¶
Intel® Neural Compressor supports multiple quantization modes such as Post Training Static Quantization (PTQ static), Post Training Dynamic Quantization (PTQ dynamic), Quantization Aware Training, etc. One operator (OP) with a specific quantization mode has multiple ways to quantize, for example it may have multiple quantization scheme(symmetric/asymmetric), calibration algorithm(Min-Max/KL Divergence), etc. We use the framework capability
to represent the methods that we have already supported. The tuning space
includes all tuning items and their options. For example, the tuning items and options of the Conv2D
(PyTorch) supported by Intel® Neural Compressor are as follows:
To incorporate the human experience and reduce the tuning time, user can reduce the tuning space by specifying the op_name_list
and op_type_list
in PostTrainingQuantConfig
(QuantizationAwareTrainingConfig
). Before tuning, the strategy will merge these configurations with framework capability to create the final tuning space.
Exit Policy¶
User can control the tuning process by setting the exit policy by specifying the timeout
, and max_trials
fields in the TuningCriterion
.
from neural_compressor.config import TuningCriterion
tuning_criterion=TuningCriterion(
timeout=0, # optional. tuning timeout (seconds). When set to 0, early stopping is enabled.
max_trials=100, # optional. max tuning times. combined with the `timeout` field to decide when to exit tuning.
strategy="basic", # optional. name of the tuning strategy.
strategy_kwargs=None, # optional. see concrete tuning strategy for available settings.
)
Accuracy Criteria¶
User can set the accuracy criteria by specifying the higher_is_better
, criterion
, and tolerable_loss
fields in the AccuracyCriterion
.
from neural_compressor.config import AccuracyCriterion
accuracy_criterion=AccuracyCriterion(
higher_is_better=True, # optional.
criterion='relative', # optional. Available values are 'relative' and 'absolute'.
tolerable_loss=0.01, # optional.
)
Traverse¶
Once the tuning space
was constructed, user can specify the traverse logic by setting the quant_level
field with 0
or 1
in the PostTrainingQuantConfig
(QuantizationAwareTrainingConfig
), or the strategy
field with strategy name in the TuningCriterion
. The priority of quant_level
is higher than strategy
, which means the quant_level
should be set to 1
if user wants to specify the traverse logic by strategy name. The design and usage of each traverse logic is introduced in the following session.
Traverse Logic¶
O0¶
Design¶
The quantization level O0
is designed for user who want to keep the accuracy of the model after quantization. It starts with the original(fp32
) model, and then quantize the OPs to lower precision OP type wisely and OP wisely.
Usage¶
To use O0
, the quant_level
field should be set to 0
in PostTrainingQuantConfig
(or QuantizationAwareTrainingConfig
).
from neural_compressor import config
conf = config.PostTrainingQuantConfig(
quant_level=0, # the quantization level.
tuning_criterion=config.TuningCriterion(
timeout=0, # optional. tuning timeout (seconds). When set to 0, early stopping is enabled.
max_trials=100, # optional. max tuning times. combined with the `timeout` field to decide when to exit tuning.
),
)
Basic¶
Design¶
The Basic
strategy is designed for quantizing most models. There are three stages executed by Basic
strategy sequentially, and the tuning process ends once the condition meets the exit policy.
Stage I. OP Type Wise Tuning
In this stage, it tries to quantize the OPs as many as possible and traverse all OP type wise tuning configs. Note that, the OP is initialized with different quantization modes according to the quantization approach.
a.
post_training_static_quant
: Quantize all OPs support PTQ static.b.
post_training_dynamic_quant
: Quantize all OPs support PTQ dynamic.c.
post_training_auto_quant
: Quantize all OPs support PTQ static or PTQ dynamic. For OPs supporting both PTQ static and PTQ dynamic, PTQ static will be tried first, and PTQ dynamic will be tried when none of the OP type wise tuning configs meet the accuracy loss criteria.Stage II. Fallback OP One by One
In this stage, it performs high-precision OP (FP32, BF16 …) fallbacks one by one based on the tuning config with the best result in the previous stage, and records the impact of each OP.
Stage III. Fallback Multiple OPs Accumulated
In the final stage, it first sorted the OPs list according to the impact score in stage II, and tries to incrementally fallback multiple OPs to high precision according to the sorted OP list.
Usage¶
Basic
is the default strategy. It can be used by default with nothing changed in the strategy
field of TuningCriterion
. Classical settings are shown below:
from neural_compressor import config
conf = config.PostTrainingQuantConfig(
tuning_criterion=config.TuningCriterion(
strategy="basic", # optional. name of tuning strategy.
),
)
MSE¶
Design¶
MSE
and Basic
strategies share similar ideas. The primary difference
between the two strategies is the way sorted op lists generated in stage II. The MSE
strategy needs to get the tensors for each OP of raw FP32
models and the quantized model based on the best model-wise tuning
configuration. It then calculates the MSE (Mean Squared Error) for each
OP, sorts those OPs according to the MSE value, and performs
the op-wise fallback in this order.
Usage¶
The usage of MSE
is similar to Basic
. To use MSE
strategy, the strategy
field of the TuningCriterion
should be specified with mse
.
from neural_compressor import config
conf = config.PostTrainingQuantConfig(
tuning_criterion=config.TuningCriterion(
strategy="mse",
),
)
MSE_V2¶
Design¶
MSE_v2
is a strategy with a two stages fallback and revert fallback. In the fallback stage, it uses multi-batch data to score the op impact and then fallback the op with the highest score util found the quantized model meets accuracy criteria. In the revert fallback stage, it also scores the impact of fallback OPs in the previous stage and selects the op with the lowest score to revert the fallback until the quantized model not meets accuracy criteria.
Usage¶
To use the MSE_V2
tuning strategy, the strategy
field in the TuningCriterion
should be specified with mse_v2
. Also, the confidence_batches
can be specified optionally inside the strategy_kwargs
for the number of batches to score the op impact. Increasing confidence_batches
will generally improve the accuracy of the scoring with more time spent in tuning process.
from neural_compressor import config
conf = config.PostTrainingQuantConfig(
tuning_criterion=config.TuningCriterion(
strategy="mse_v2",
strategy_kwargs={"confidence_batches":2},
),
)
HAWQ_V2¶
Design¶
HAWQ_V2
implements the Hessian Aware trace-Weighted Quantization of Neural Networks. We made a small change to it by using the hessian trace to score the op impact and then fallback the OPs according to the scoring result.
Usage¶
To use the HAWQ_V2
tuning strategy, the strategy
field in the TuningCriterion
should be specified with hawq_v2
, and the loss function for calculating the hessian trace of model should be provided. The loss function should be set in the field of hawq_v2_loss
in the strategy_kwargs
.
from neural_compressor import config
def model_loss(output, target, criterion):
return criterion(output, target)
conf = config.PostTrainingQuantConfig(
tuning_criterion=config.TuningCriterion(
strategy="hawq_v2",
strategy_kwargs={"hawq_v2_loss": model_loss},
),
)
Bayesian¶
Design¶
Bayesian
optimization is a sequential design strategy for the global
optimization of black-box functions. This strategy comes from the Bayesian
optimization package and
changed it to a discrete version that complied with the strategy standard of
Intel® Neural Compressor. It uses Gaussian processes to define
the prior/posterior distribution over the black-box function with the tuning
history and then finds the tuning configuration that maximizes the expected
improvement. For now, Bayesian
just focus on op-wise quantization configs tuning
without the fallback phase. In order to obtain a quantized model with good accuracy
and better performance in a short time. We don’t add datatype as a tuning
parameter into Bayesian
.
Usage¶
For the Bayesian
strategy, it is recommended to set timeout
or max_trials
to a non-zero
value as shown in below example, because the param space for bayesian
can be very small and the accuracy goal might not be reached, which can make the tuning end never. Additionally, if the log level is set to debug
by LOGLEVEL=DEBUG
in the environment variable, the message [DEBUG] Tuning config was evaluated, skip!
will print endlessly. If the timeout
is changed from 0 to an integer, Bayesian
ends after the timeout is reached.
from neural_compressor import config
conf = config.PostTrainingQuantConfig(
tuning_criterion=config.TuningCriterion(
timeout=0, # optional. tuning timeout (seconds). When set to 0, early stopping is enabled.
max_trials=100, # optional. max tuning times. combined with the `timeout` field to decide when to exit tuning.
strategy="bayesian", # optional. name of the tuning strategy.
),
)
Exhaustive¶
Design¶
The Exhaustive
strategy is used to sequentially traverse all possible tuning
configurations in a tuning space. From the perspective of the impact on
performance, we currently only traverse all possible quantization tuning
configs. Same reason as Bayesian
, fallback datatypes are not included for now.
Usage¶
Exhaustive
usage is similar to basic
, with exhaustive
specified to strategy
field in the TuningCriterion
.
from neural_compressor import config
conf = config.PostTrainingQuantConfig(
tuning_criterion=config.TuningCriterion(
strategy="exhaustive",
),
)
Random¶
Design¶
Random
strategy is used to randomly choose tuning configurations from the
tuning space. As with the Exhaustive
strategy, it also only considers quantization
tuning configs to generate a better-performance quantized model.
Usage¶
Random
usage is similar to basic
, with random
specified to strategy
field in the TuningCriterion
.
from neural_compressor import config
conf = config.PostTrainingQuantConfig(
tuning_criterion=config.TuningCriterion(
strategy="random",
),
)
SigOpt¶
Design¶
SigOpt
strategy is to use SigOpt Optimization Loop method to accelerate and visualize the traversal of the tuning configurations from the tuning space. The metrics add accuracy as a constraint and optimize for latency to improve performance. SigOpt Projects can show the result of each tuning experiment.
Usage¶
Compared to Basic
, sigopt_api_token
and sigopt_project_id
are necessary for SigOpt
.
For details, how to use sigopt strategy in neural_compressor is available.
Note that the sigopt_api_token
, sigopt_project_id
, and sigopt_experiment_name
should be set inside the strategy_kwargs
.
from neural_compressor import config
conf = config.PostTrainingQuantConfig(
tuning_criterion=config.TuningCriterion(
strategy="sigopt",
strategy_kwargs={
"sigopt_api_token": "YOUR-ACCOUNT-API-TOKEN",
"sigopt_project_id": "PROJECT-ID",
"sigopt_experiment_name": "nc-tune",
},
),
)
TPE¶
Design¶
TPE
uses sequential model-based optimization methods (SMBOs). Sequential refers to running trials one after another and selecting a better
hyperparameter to evaluate based on previous trials. A hyperparameter is
a parameter whose value is set before the learning process begins; it
controls the learning process. SMBO apples Bayesian reasoning in that it
updates a surrogate model that represents an objective function
(objective functions are more expensive to compute). Specifically, it finds
hyperparameters that perform best on the surrogate and then applies them to
the objective function. The process is repeated and the surrogate is updated
with incorporated new results until the timeout or max trials is reached.
A surrogate model and selection criteria can be built in a variety of ways.
TPE
builds a surrogate model by applying Bayesian reasoning. The TPE
algorithm consists of the following steps:
Define a domain of hyperparameter search space.
Create an objective function that takes in hyperparameters and outputs a score (e.g., loss, RMSE, cross-entropy) that we want to minimize.
Collect a few observations (score) using a randomly selected set of hyperparameters.
Sort the collected observations by score and divide them into two groups based on some quantile. The first group (x1) contains observations that give the best scores and the second one (x2) contains all other observations.
Model the two densities l(x1) and g(x2) using Parzen Estimators (also known as kernel density estimators), which are a simple average of kernels centered on existing data points.
Draw sample hyperparameters from l(x1). Evaluate them in terms of l(x1)/g(x2), and return the set that yields the minimum value under l(x1)/g(x1) that corresponds to the greatest expected improvement. Evaluate these hyperparameters on the objective function.
Update the observation list in step 3.
Repeat steps 4-7 with a fixed number of trials.
Note: TPE requires many iterations in order to reach an optimal solution. It is recommended to run at least 200 iterations, because every iteration requires evaluation of a generated model, which means accuracy measurements on a dataset and latency measurements using a benchmark. This process may take from 24 hours to a few days to complete, depending on the model.
Usage¶
TPE
usage is similar to basic
with tpe
specified to strategy
field in the TuningCriterion
.
from neural_compressor import config
conf = config.PostTrainingQuantConfig(
tuning_criterion=config.TuningCriterion(
strategy="tpe",
),
)
Customize a New Tuning Strategy¶
Intel® Neural Compressor supports new strategy extension by implementing a sub-class of the TuneStrategy
class in neural_compressor.strategy package and registering it by the strategy_registry
decorator.
For example, user can implement an Abc
strategy like below:
@strategy_registry
class AbcTuneStrategy(TuneStrategy):
def __init__(self, model, conf, q_dataloader, q_func=None,
eval_dataloader=None, eval_func=None, dicts=None):
...
def next_tune_cfg(self):
# generate the next tuning config
...
def traverse(self):
for tune_cfg in self.next_tune_cfg():
# do quantization
...
The next_tune_cfg
function is used to yield the next tune configuration according to some algorithm or strategy. TuneStrategy
base class will traverse all the tuning space till a quantization configuration meets the pre-defined accuracy criterion.
The traverse
function can be overridden optionally if the traverse logic required by the new strategy is different from the one TuneStrategy
base class implemented.
An example of customizing a new tuning strategy can be reached at TPE Strategy.