connectPorts function
- PortReference driver,
- PortReference receiver, {
- String? driverPathNewPortName,
- String? receiverPathNewPortName,
- bool allowDriverPathUniquification = true,
- bool allowReceiverPathUniquification = true,
Makes a connection from driver to receiver, punching ports along the way
as necessary.
If driverPathNewPortName or receiverPathNewPortName are provided, then
it will prefer to name new ports with those names. If
allowDriverPathUniquification or allowReceiverPathUniquification are
false, then the port names will not be uniquified on those paths.
Uniquification also respects BridgeModule.allowUniquification at each
level.
Implementation
void connectPorts(
PortReference driver,
PortReference receiver, {
String? driverPathNewPortName,
String? receiverPathNewPortName,
bool allowDriverPathUniquification = true,
bool allowReceiverPathUniquification = true,
}) {
// TODO(mkorbel1): need to add better control over naming of intermediate
// ports -- default allow renaming? or should it prefer the top/leaf?
if (driver.module.hasBuilt || receiver.module.hasBuilt) {
throw RohdBridgeException('Cannot connect ports after build.');
}
final driverInstance = driver.module;
final receiverInstance = receiver.module;
BridgeModule? commonParent;
final driverIsReceiver = driver.module == receiver.module;
final driverContainsReceiver =
(driver.module.getHierarchyDownTo(receiver.module) != null) &&
!driverIsReceiver;
final receiverContainsDriver =
(receiver.module.getHierarchyDownTo(driver.module) != null) &&
!driverIsReceiver;
if (!driverContainsReceiver &&
!receiverContainsDriver &&
driverInstance != receiverInstance &&
(driver.direction == receiver.direction) &&
((driver.direction != PortDirection.inOut) ||
(receiver.direction != PortDirection.inOut))) {
// e.g. feed-through
throw RohdBridgeException(
'Unhandled directionality and hierarchy of driver and receiver.');
} else if ((driverContainsReceiver || receiverContainsDriver) &&
(receiver.direction != driver.direction) &&
(receiver.direction != PortDirection.inOut &&
driver.direction != PortDirection.inOut)) {
final containsStr = driverContainsReceiver
? 'driver ${driver.module.name} contains'
' receiver ${receiver.module.name}'
: 'receiver ${receiver.module.name} contains'
' driver ${driver.module.name}';
throw RohdBridgeException(
'Vertical connections should have the same direction,'
' but with $driver driving $receiver, '
' $containsStr, but directions are'
' ${driver.direction} and ${receiver.direction}, respectively.');
} else {
commonParent =
findCommonParent(driverInstance, receiverInstance) as BridgeModule?;
if (driverContainsReceiver || receiverContainsDriver) {
if (receiver.portName == driver.portName) {
// if we're going up/down and the port names are the same, then we
// should keep the intermediate name the same
driverPathNewPortName ??= driver.portName;
receiverPathNewPortName ??= receiver.portName;
}
}
}
if (commonParent == null) {
throw RohdBridgeException('No common parent found between'
' $driverInstance and $receiverInstance');
}
// start from the driver
var driverPortRef = driver;
if (driverInstance != commonParent) {
// we need to punch upwards from the driver to the common parent
final driverPath = commonParent.getHierarchyDownTo(driverInstance)!;
for (var i = driverPath.length - 2; i >= 1; i--) {
final driverPathI = driverPath[i] as BridgeModule;
final uniqName = driverPathI._getUniquePortName(
driverPortRef,
initialName: driverPathNewPortName,
allowNameUniquification: allowDriverPathUniquification,
);
driverPortRef = driverPortRef.punchUpTo(
driverPathI,
newPortName: uniqName,
);
}
}
// now start from the receiver, pulling up
var receiverPortRef = receiver;
// keep track of all created receiver ports so far so we can update
// the corresponding modules' [_upperSourceMap]s
final createdReceiverPorts = <PortReference>[];
if (receiverInstance != commonParent) {
// we need to punch upwards from the receiver to the common parent
final receiverPath = commonParent.getHierarchyDownTo(receiverInstance)!;
for (var i = receiverPath.length - 2; i >= 1; i--) {
// find if there are ports that are already connected to the driver from
// anywhere up the chain
final upperTargets = TraverseableCollection<PortReference>()
..add(driverPortRef);
// TODO(mkorbel1): is there a more efficient way to do this search? can
// something be cached efficiently?
final receiverPathI = receiverPath[i] as BridgeModule;
for (var upperTargIdx = 0;
upperTargIdx < upperTargets.length;
upperTargIdx++) {
final upperTarg = upperTargets[upperTargIdx];
final upperTargTargs = receiverPath
.getRange(1, i + 1)
.map((receiverPathMod) =>
(receiverPathMod as BridgeModule)._upperSourceMap[upperTarg])
.nonNulls;
for (final iterUpperTargi in upperTargTargs) {
if (receiverPathI._upperSourceMap.containsKey(iterUpperTargi)) {
// if we already have a known connection up to the driver from
// here, then we can just connect to the existing port and exit
// immediately
receiverPortRef
.gets(receiverPathI._upperSourceMap[iterUpperTargi]!);
return;
}
upperTargets.add(iterUpperTargi);
}
}
final uniqName = receiverPathI._getUniquePortName(
receiverPortRef,
initialName: receiverPathNewPortName,
allowNameUniquification: allowReceiverPathUniquification,
);
receiverPortRef =
receiverPortRef.punchUpTo(receiverPathI, newPortName: uniqName);
createdReceiverPorts.add(receiverPortRef);
// now we tell all prior-created ports that they can access the current
// receiver port via the port that was created.
for (final createdReceiverPort in createdReceiverPorts) {
final receiverPortModule = createdReceiverPort.module;
assert(!receiverPortModule._upperSourceMap.containsKey(receiverPortRef),
'should not be recreating a path if one already exists.');
receiverPortModule._upperSourceMap[receiverPortRef] =
createdReceiverPort;
}
}
}
// also notify about the top-level driver
for (final createdReceiverPort in [receiver, ...createdReceiverPorts]) {
final receiverPortModule = createdReceiverPort.module;
receiverPortModule._upperSourceMap[driverPortRef] = createdReceiverPort;
}
receiverPortRef.gets(driverPortRef);
}